National Underwriter - January 16, 2012

Cringe or Cry: Recent Results for
P&C Insurers Are Full of Bad News

BY SAM J. FRIEDMAN

REad ’EM and weep, folks! I couldn’t help but cringe a bit as I reviewed the P&C industry’s consolidated results for the first three quarters of 2011. It was bad news galore. Even the few bits of “good” news had a negative tinge.

let’s start with the bottom line: net income fell by over two-thirds, down from

$27.1 billion in the first nine months of 2010 to a relatively paltry $8 billion last year. That sent the industry’s rate of return plummeting to a measly 1.9 percent, compared with a below-average but still-respectable 6. 8 percent in 2010.

I admit there were mitigating circumstances to consider. Unusually high catastrophe losses were clearly a prime factor in the industry’s poor showing thus far for 2011, tripling from $10.8 billion through the first nine months of 2010 to a staggering $33.2 billion last year.

However, ISO noted that even if cat losses last year had been the same as they were in 2010, the combined ratio would still have risen 1.7 points through nine months to 102.9, which is nothing to write home about.

The industry may also take some comfort from the fact that the rate of return was impacted by severely negative numbers posted by mortgage and financial-guaranty carriers. Excluding those insurers, the rate of return was actually 3 percent. But that was still down considerably from the 7. 8 percent posted in 2010—again, no cause for bragging.

Under these conditions, it’s no wonder policyholder surplus was drained a bit, falling $20.6 billion ( 3. 7 percent) from year-end 2010 to a still hefty $538.6 billion after nine months last year. The industry likely remains overcapitalized given the slow growth in insurable exposures, but the big question is what insurers will do with that excess capacity.

The good news (at least for sellers, but

not buyers of insurance) is that higher prices in both commercial and personal lines for many accounts boosted net-written premiums by 3.1 percent over the first nine months of 2011—the highest growth rate posted since 2006. It certainly beat 2010’s 1.2 percent gain and 2009’s 4. 6 percent decline.

In addition, after excluding those

The bottom line:

Net income fell by over two-thirds, down from $27.1 billion in the first nine months of 2010 to a relatively paltry $8 billion last year.”

nasty mortgage and financial-guaranty
results once again, those writing primarily
commercial lines saw premium volume rise
by 3. 9 percent, compared to a decline of
1.9 percent the previous year.
However, temper that with the news
that those primarily writing personal lines
saw growth slow a bit to 3.1 percent,
down from 3. 6 percent in 2010. and keep
in mind that even without the effects
of catastrophes, insured losses and loss-
adjustment expenses were up 5.1 percent—
which means the industry overall is still
losing ground.

So where does that leave the P&C industry going into 2012? That depends on a number of factors:

J Is the nine-month surplus decline indicative of the P&C industry consciously burning through excess capital, or is it just the result of a bad year of cat losses?

J Will insurers have the underwriting discipline to walk away from underpriced risks, or will they seek greater market share by competing more aggressively on price, undermining the staying power of what has been a firming commercial and personal-lines market?

J Will insurers raise prices high enough to make up for rising losses and weaker bond yields, so they can produce a decent rate of return for a change?

Of course, all bets are off if the fragile U.S. economic recovery stalls thanks to the crises in the Eurozone, a petering-out of federal stimulus funds, cuts in state-government spending, a lingering housing-market slump, federal-government paralysis in this election year, or any combination of these and other factors yet to emerge.

The other major question will be what happens with cat losses in 2012. last year may have been unusual in terms of disaster losses, but then again, given the speculation about climate change, might this be the “new normal” for insurers?

and even though disaster claims soared last year, outside of Hurricane Irene, we didn’t have a monster storm slam into the U.S. mainland. If one should hit Florida or the Gulf Coast (or even new york—Irene was way too close a call for someone like me, living near Brooklyn’s beaches), industry surplus could be drained in a hurry.

The top insurance company CEOs and heads of the major associations recently came together for their annual family reunion—better known as the P&C Joint Industry Forum—and it will be interesting to hear what was on their minds when reports from what was discussed at the event start to appear.

Most likely, it will be anything but business as usual for insurers in 2012: They’ll have to cope with the threat of mounting cat exposures, declining bond-investment returns and an uncertain economic recovery.